لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of the offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for likely offenders.
4. Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Although the petitioner has obtained bail in People cases, it does, prima facie, create that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
Usually, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including All those in clear violation of recognized case law) to the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as case will not be appealed, the decision will stand.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID necessary) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of an individual’s date of birth.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It's also a properly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
only within the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. more info Read more
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as being the Voice Case Information System, that allows callers to acquire primary case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to use and accessible 24 hours a day.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence and the evidentiary value whereof would be seen with the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is not going to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. Eventually, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have damaging effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration about the Environment and Development, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used as being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.